Our Overtourism Policy

Media headlines and tourism data have been clear on the negative impact of overtourism; a 2018 report commissioned by the European Parliament found that the potential effects are severely putting both natural and cultural heritage sites at risk through a mix of environmental, economic and social factors, with coastal regions, islands and rural sites amongst the most vulnerable destinations.  

As a business, we are contributing to the negative impact if we continue to send visitors to over-subscribed destinations without putting some measures in place that alleviate the pressure. With this policy, we aim to demonstrate one way in which a travel company can provide a solution and sensitivity to a complex problem and encourage others to look to implement their own solutions. 

We have decided to cap the number of properties we represent in locations that have a problem with overtourism, and where second homes used as holiday lets are impacting local communities. Although capping Sawday’s / Canopy & Stars / Paws & Stay properties won’t solve overtourism, it does demonstrate an acknowledgement of the problem and that we are taking action to improve the situation.

Travel and accommodation companies placing limitations will help mitigate over-demand. While this approach may increase prices and make it less accessible to those on lower incomes, a targeted strategy to promote less visited places will help, as will encouraging travellers to opt for often cheaper and less busy periods. What is clear is that doing nothing is no longer an option, even at a cost to our business, in the same way that flights using sustainable or green hydrogen fuel cost more but should become the norm. Some cities, such as Dubrovnik, have started capping the number of cruise ship calls, so this is an approach already applied by destinations. We are proud to be the first company to cap the number of places to stay in an affected destination.

Our impact may seem small through this policy, but we are aiming to inspire other travel and accommodation companies to consider reducing capacity and place self-imposed caps on their numbers of properties or bed numbers in affected destinations. National, regional and local councils, governments and tourist boards need to play their part with a range of measures to counter this problem as we are only a tiny part of solving this complex issue.

In addition to capping, we’ll provide information to guests to help them make informed decisions about responsible tourism and how they can help reduce overtourism. In this, we’re glad to have the excellent example of Responsible Travel, who produced this superb programme, to follow.

We will cap by the number of properties, rather than beds. Our policy includes all types of places to stay. The number of places capped are shown below and each Sawday’s brand will have their own limits. If an owner features a place with two or more brands, this will only be counted once. Any arbitration will be carried out by our Sustainability & Impact Manager.

Our destination caps mean we will not be able to increase the number of spaces in the areas listed above. It may mean we have to stop representing an existing place before accepting a new one; we will consider the environmental and ethical standards of competing places before making any decision.

This is by no means an exhaustive list and over time, we may add additional destinations or review the numbers as the situation evolves.